I made a simple promotional poster for our movie. This poster would be displayed in cinemas, magazines, social media sites and at bus stops. The candle represents the candles that we used around the Ouija board in our movie. The background is black to make the candle in the foreground stand out.
Explain how you are going to make progress next year-
Next year i will be aiming to expand on my knowledge of key terms and concepts as well as using even more complex types of shots in the production of our trailer, we will look to work more effectively in the actual blogger work, make sure our trailer is filmed quickly and efficiently as well as setting deadlines for ourselves about the actual theory work involved.
What would you have done differently and why-
The film we made this year turned out looking a lot better than i had expected it too and showed me that as a group we could work as a cooperative unit and get work done, not always by set deadlines but we do catch up and make sure the work is the best quality possible. If i had to do something differently i would of made it so we took a little more time with the filming, this is because we only had two real days of filming and so we had to rush into stuff without a proper plan of what we are going to film, the lighting in the walking in scene is something i would change as well, this happened because we started filming a different day at a different time and so none of us realized the light wasn't in the previous scene.
What are you aiming for to do in your next production to improve your film-making?
Mise en scene- in our film i liked the simplistic idea of simple is better, the amount of props we used was limited simply to the Ouija board, some candles, face-paint and fake blood. In order to improve it we should maybe have spent a little more time on making the makeup cover the monsters face entirely as well as making sure his clothes don't come into shot.
Camera composition- Next year i am aiming to use even more different types of shots in the production of our trailer, even though we used a variety of different shots this year, i would like to expand on this and add even more shots to get higher marks.
Editing- The editing this year i thought went really well on Adobe premiere elements 10, seeing it was the first real time we had used an editing software the end product came out really well, something i would improve would be the time it actually took to edit as it took many hours to learn the basics of a new software and so next year we can move onto more complex editing techniques which will further enhance the quality of our film.
Sound- The lack of diegetic sound we used was deliberate as in horror movies it is essential for there to be a high amount of tension, we managed to conform to the genre well as we had limited voice inputs as well as only a few amounts of sounds such as the door moving or the match lighting. Next year i would like to try and find a soundtrack which hasn't been used as much and maybe is easier to manipulate to what i want.
The film with annotations added to it after an analysis of all evaluation tasks, the actual annotations tells us specific parts of the story as well as explaining the four concepts in media (mise en scene, camera composition, editing and sound) which we use, the annotations also include the particular audience we are aiming for, whats a special feature of our film as well as general conventions.
This part of the evaluation will show a comparison between similar parts of our film and the original preliminary task, this helps us to look back and see the difference in quality from our first task to the end product.
the first two shot comparison is the match on action shot we used in both tasks, the first shot being in the preliminary task was well done and can be seen clearly as a match on action shot, however in the actual film we couldn't properly edit yet so we ended up cutting the clip too late leaving a delayed hold of the actual door handle, the actual film however had a perfect match on action shot as the turn of the handle opened straightaway into the panning shot of the Ouija board setting, along with the production credits down the bottom giving recognition to the people in the film, this shows a mass difference as in all films today the production credits are an essential part of a films opening.
The panning shot mentioned before was used in both tasks as well. In our preliminary tasks we filmed Zoe as she walked into the room and sit down showing myself as well as an introduction to my character, with the casual clothes we were wearing at the time and the classroom environment tells the audience that we were in the last few years of school. In the actual film we used a panning shot as well with the establishment of the Ouija scene more on the agenda instead of introducing the characters who were introduced in the scene before.
The establishment of characters personality's was established in both tasks differently, in the preliminary task we had a shot reverse shot of the two main characters and a bit of speech to help the audience relate truly to the characters, in the actual film we used a variety of closeups to help establish the type of characters they are, this was especially apparent through the characters reactions where they all reacted differently depending on stereotypical roles of specif characters in movies.
The close ups we used is so the audience can greatly relate to the character at hand, the over the shoulder shot used in our preliminary task was so we can see the relationship between two characters as friends as they are talking directly to each other. The second shot in the actual film is a two person shot where both characters have a medium shot of the body, this gives us more emphasis on the outfits they are wearing, this helps the audience to relate to the character as they can see what they are wearing and especially if the audience is young they will be able to relate to the character as they are also young.
This is the directors commentary made over the original clip with all of us talking at different sections about specific parts of the film e.g. mise en scene, camera composition, editing and sound etc., we were tasked with narrating about our film using specific examples of media terminology whilst the film is playing in the background, this allows us to get a proper bit of analysis over the actual film from the people which made the actual film.
What does a production company do?- A production company usually has mass funding and is in charge of most aspects of the filming, usually they take care with the hiring of all essential staff such as the director, producer, screenwriter, actors, marketing manager etc. They are in charge of all the making of the film and when and how they will produce it, whether or not they release more than one trailer or use social media as an important platform to release it on, e.g. trailer on Facebook or YouTube.
In our film we made the production company IFM studios (independent film making studios), the logo we created is simple but effective with the picture being a non-copyright image as well as the studios bit having a line running above it.
The idea of the distributor and who that might be and why- A distributor usually is in charge of setting a release date for the films release which would benefit the film well in the cinemas, for example if Disney are producing a film at Christmas then the distributor must know that it won't be able to out perform Disney and therefore reschedule the films release for another date. If they are a smaller company they may also have to decide which cinema to release the film in, what company they will use to help them or whether or not they will release it in 3D or on Blu ray. Warner bro's studios is a good example as it makes the films whereas Warner bro's pictures produces it saving the company a larger share of the money.
The distribution company we created was called triptic films and the logo we created was a shot taken from our original setup with the candles, the actual candles in the few seconds they are on screen change to a different colour (from black and white to colour) which makes the actual company logo look a lot more professional.
Where the money might have come from for a film such as yours- Seeing our film is a horror film its all about the actual suspense and being able to draw audiences in to watch the actual film, unfortunately however when trailers for horror films are usually produced they normally look really good with lots of scary parts in the trailer but when you see the actual film the trailer has ruined it and there is no more scary bits to show. With our film being the opening two minutes we need to try and lure audiences in through scary factors, in our film we did a preview of the what would have been the end of the film, with the cliffhanger at the end providing the perfect opportunity in the next scene to put it back a few weeks before the incident happened so people can relate more to the characters and get to know them more. Money would have usually come through the release of the trailer and through YouTube views or people sharing it on social media.
Why the various people are named in the titles- which jobs appear in titles and in what order and how have you reflected this?- We ended up naming all of the actors who were involved, the particular order in which we did it was chosen because it best reflects the groups input, for example the first three names that come up are of the people in the actual group (me, Billy and Zoe), this is because we had the greatest influence on the making of the film as it was our idea and all the mise en scene, camera composition, editing and sound was done by us three. The next three names in the opening are of the other three actors in our group who didn't necessarily have an impact on our films making but were crucial in the filming, Matt was mentioned first as he created the original script which we were supposed to use and therefore in the opening credits it said "written by Matt Cottee".We did however change the script around a bit on the day of the filming as we believed for a horror film the less amount of speech the better as it gives more emphasis on the actual music and the little amount of speech we actually have. The other bit of writing shown said "directed by Billy Budgen" this was because on the day of filming Billy took control of where he wanted the camera to be, what order people should walk, what shot should go after another etc. While the rest of the group made sure that he stuck to the 180 degree rule so the audience don't get disorientated whilst inputting loads of ideas ourselves.
What your film is similar to "institutionally" (name some films which would be released in the same way)-A good film which we can relate our film too is the actual film Ouija which just like ours had a group of friends who use a Ouija board and then suffer the consequences of evil spirits. Unfriended is also a film similar to ours as they are both about spirits and a group of friends who get into trouble from forces beyond their control. These are not the only matters which are similar between our films, for example all three are horror and are aimed at an audience of 15 plus, they all have some sort of malevolent spirit which is unknown and shown in a dark atmosphere. The sounds we used are just like those in actual horror movies with quiet music gradually getting louder and then disappearing completely before the big reveal of a jump scare or the main antagonist character moving somewhere, the short sharp sounds used in horror movies help to create an intense atmosphere, for example in our film there was the door slamming at the start and the leader of the group turning the door handle, this sounds like the actual sound has been amplified as everything else is dead quiet around it, this is good as it brings more emphasis onto the sounds and the growing intensity of the music.
This is the exact camera used to film almost all of the film, it was a good quality camera worth a few hundred pounds and used by professionals to get good quality images in places all around the world. The picture is of a member of our group holding the actual camera, this was taken on a day when we were searching for a place to film before the final idea of filming at my house.
The tripod shown is the exact same model as the one we actually filmed with, it provided a stable, flexible base to help keep the camera steady at all times to ensure the best quality image. It was very effective for us as you could change the length of each leg to make it as easy as possible to film on rougher terrain such as outside if we needed to or on the stairs like we did in the opening bit of the scene when we all walk through the door.
Adobe premiere elements 10 was the chosen software which we used to edit the actual film, it was the most simple and effective piece of software which we could of used for the task in question, with easily navigable controls and a simple yet user friendly interface we found it relatively easy to get used to and we kept expanding our knowledge of the software through trial and error and just a simple look around the interface.
Our target audience member is a teenager because we believe age wise the horror genre greatly appeals to them especially when out with dates or mates. They would also be into action and thriller films and with the emergence of Disney as a movie studios who appeal to all age ranges they may also watch animated films.
Usually teenagers would shop in a variety of places depending on what they want to buy, for example top-man or primark may be a popular option as they are cheap and the clothes decent enough quality, they would go to either game or H and M to get their games and music.
Teenagers listen to a variety of different types of music and depending on their character, they end up listening to these different types, for example they could listen to pop, rock, indie, country, classical, techno and dubstep.
Favorite TV programmes could be anything including: The 100, American Horror Story, Top Gear, Doctor Who, Lost, Sherlock, The Walking Dead, Grimm, Teen Wolf, Breaking Bad, Game of Thrones, Spongebob, Match of the day, Hannibal, Jersey shore and the island
the first two shot comparison is the match on action shot we used in both tasks, the first shot being in the preliminary task was well done and can be seen clearly as a match on action shot, however in the actual film we couldn't properly edit yet so we ended up cutting the clip too late leaving a delayed hold of the actual door handle, the actual film however had a perfect match on action shot as the turn of the handle opened straightaway into the panning shot of the Ouija board setting, along with the production credits down the bottom giving recognition to the people in the film, this shows a mass difference as in all films today the production credits are an essential part of a films opening.
The panning shot mentioned before was used in both tasks as well. In our preliminary tasks we filmed Zoe as she walked into the room and sit down showing myself as well as an introduction to my character, with the casual clothes we were wearing at the time and the classroom environment tells the audience that we were in the last few years of school. In the actual film we used a panning shot as well with the establishment of the Ouija scene more on the agenda instead of introducing the characters who were introduced in the scene before.
The establishment of characters personality's was established in both tasks differently, in the preliminary task we had a shot reverse shot of the two main characters and a bit of speech to help the audience relate truly to the characters, in the actual film we used a variety of closeups to help establish the type of characters they are, this was especially apparent through the characters reactions where they all reacted differently depending on stereotypical roles of specif characters in movies.
The close ups we used is so the audience can greatly relate to the character at hand, the over the shoulder shot used in our preliminary task was so we can see the relationship between two characters as friends as they are talking directly to each other. The second shot in the actual film is a two person shot where both characters have a medium shot of the body, this gives us more emphasis on the outfits they are wearing, this helps the audience to relate to the character as they can see what they are wearing and especially if the audience is young they will be able to relate to the character as they are also young.
What does a production company do?- A production company usually has mass funding and is in charge of most aspects of the filming, usually they take care with the hiring of all essential staff such as the director, producer, screenwriter, actors, marketing manager etc. They are in charge of all the making of the film and when and how they will produce it, whether or not they release more than one trailer or use social media as an important platform to release it on, e.g. trailer on Facebook or YouTube.
Why the various people are named in the titles- which jobs appear in titles and in what order and how have you reflected this?- We ended up naming all of the actors who were involved, the particular order in which we did it was chosen because it best reflects the groups input, for example the first three names that come up are of the people in the actual group (me, Billy and Zoe), this is because we had the greatest influence on the making of the film as it was our idea and all the mise en scene, camera composition, editing and sound was done by us three. The next three names in the opening are of the other three actors in our group who didn't necessarily have an impact on our films making but were crucial in the filming, Matt was mentioned first as he created the original script which we were supposed to use and therefore in the opening credits it said "written by Matt Cottee".We did however change the script around a bit on the day of the filming as we believed for a horror film the less amount of speech the better as it gives more emphasis on the actual music and the little amount of speech we actually have. The other bit of writing shown said "directed by Billy Budgen" this was because on the day of filming Billy took control of where he wanted the camera to be, what order people should walk, what shot should go after another etc. While the rest of the group made sure that he stuck to the 180 degree rule so the audience don't get disorientated whilst inputting loads of ideas ourselves.
This is the exact camera used to film almost all of the film, it was a good quality camera worth a few hundred pounds and used by professionals to get good quality images in places all around the world. The picture is of a member of our group holding the actual camera, this was taken on a day when we were searching for a place to film before the final idea of filming at my house.
The tripod shown is the exact same model as the one we actually filmed with, it provided a stable, flexible base to help keep the camera steady at all times to ensure the best quality image. It was very effective for us as you could change the length of each leg to make it as easy as possible to film on rougher terrain such as outside if we needed to or on the stairs like we did in the opening bit of the scene when we all walk through the door. 
Adobe premiere elements 10 was the chosen software which we used to edit the actual film, it was the most simple and effective piece of software which we could of used for the task in question, with easily navigable controls and a simple yet user friendly interface we found it relatively easy to get used to and we kept expanding our knowledge of the software through trial and error and just a simple look around the interface. 
